Ceres
New Member
Last edited by a moderator:
... the Registrant has failed to establish his bona fides in registering the disputed domain name in his name.
The stand of the respondent does not seem bonafide especially in view of the respondent's already existing domain name Arogi.com, which also offers similar services as those alleged in respect of the impugned domain name.
create digital maps, design spatial system data models, and develop geographic decision products.
Ya think .in will overpass .com? Jeez, if that will happen, I guess now's the time to register cocacola.in ibm.in caterpiller.in and all that.
Nah, if the day comes that .in surpasses .com then pressure will be put on the .in guardians to come to their senses and play fair to the .com guys. You don't want to have a reputation as a pirate base.
What do you think will happen if the US Big Bazaar clashes over websites with the Indian Big Bazaar? This could be the start of a very messy war.
Bare.in was heavily contested by the respondent, and in my opinion he had a good case.
What do you think will happen if the US Big Bazaar clashes over websites with the Indian Big Bazaar? This could be the start of a very messy war.
Actually, if you look at the reasoning used in the decisions, it would mean that .com holders should almost automatically be able to get the corresponding .in domains. However, I don't think that will happen in practice (rather, it shows how bad the reasoning in the decisions is).
Of course, your scenario makes a good headline... Big Bazaar Battle Brews